Most of the International Unions representing railroad employees possess extensive legislative departments. A primary reason these unions are active in the Legislative arena is because long ago the value of Legislation, enacted laws, was recognized to enhance working conditions for their members. A real union would prefer a law in place concerning an issue or situation affecting their members instead of an agreement with their employer. If another union initiates legislation that could benefit their members, these unions assist in lobbying for the legislation's passage, working with, instead of against, other unions. This spirit of cooperation is non-existent in ACRE's sphere of influence.

ACRE was never expected to either notify their members of the crew consist legislation or to support the Bill. If ACRE had circulated information regarding the legislation, it would have directed attention to the union officer that requested the legislation to be introduced, UTU New York State Legislative Director Sam Nasca. The basic concept concerning the legislation's benefits to members in train service is not germane to ACRE's political cause. Not promoting the legislation is indeed one aspect of this matter, however, advising members not to assist in lobbying for the legislation is reprehensible. During the ACRE Division 1 meeting in August, the merits of the crew consist legislation were discussed. Bottalico commented on the issue, and to paraphrase his remarks, he indicated that it was not productive to “ram the legislation down the company's throat” and that ACRE would negotiate the issue if necessary. Apparently, the MTA does not favor the legislation's passage. Bottalico's concerns should be for his members needs, not the interests of the MTA. How many times have you heard this phrase from Bottalico or Doyle “The company's position is…”.

ACRE is outside the House of Labor. Without the ability to cooperate with other unions on issues confronting certain crafts in the railroad industry, or railroad employees as a whole, ACRE members are denied a level of service and assistance available to members of International Unions.

A clear indication of whom Bottalico considers an associate was evident the week of 9/6 in GCT. Bottalico was escorting Katherine Lapp, Executive Director of the MTA, around the terminal, introducing her to employees. Naturally, he appeared comfortable in this role. In his capacity of General Chairman of a railroad union, in this case – Association – he should be able to interact with other railroad unions. This is not possible. A partial list of union officers you will not see in Bottalico or Doyle's company are: any International or State AFL-CIO officer, any International Union officer, any Metro North Labor Coalition officer or officers from the Long Island Railroad Unions.

Gaines, Bottalico and Doyle have called the formation of ACRE “historic”. This organization's relationship with the MTA has brought new meaning to the term “Company Union” and ACRE has achieved a degree of infamy unparalleled in the history of railroad unions.

Art May

AM/iyt