|
What
can the ACRE membership actually expect from another ACRE
contract?
During
the bargaining phase of ACRE's current contract, ACRE officers
offered varying commitments or statements to ACRE members
about what the organization would obtain for a contract
to the present membership. These comments were made without
any background information to present to the member. No
cost factors were offered, no plans or projections were
offered, how any bargaining goals would be obtained, or
what benefits or work rules might have to be addressed to
pay for any collective bargaining provisions requested.
The same scenario is being repeated this bargaining session.
Recently
ACRE's primary officers have offered conflicting versions
of the health and welfare issue for the next contract. Bottalico
informs, or rather misinforms, members to expect lifetime
medical coverage in the next agreement. Doyle states to
his members that the lifetime medical cannot be obtained
because the benefit is too expensive. How would Doyle know
the benefits cost factor without an actuarial report? Accepting
the MTA's cost analysis without an independent study is
how ACRE “negotiated” the current contract. The result was
ACRE overpaid for their “historic agreement”. We must remember
that ACRE was the only union in the entire railroad industry
that agreed to a co-payment of health and welfare costs
without being involved with a strike, mediation or an arbitration
award.
Whatever
the actuarial cost for the lifetime medical benefit is,
a fair contract will not be obtained by ACRE without addressing
the overpayment of ACRE's current agreement. ACRE cannot
and will not admit they overpaid for their contract, without
an independent analysis of benefits that are on the bargaining
table, expect a repeat performance of ACRE's first contract.
Bottalico and Doyle accepted and will agree with the MTA's
cost factors at face value in the next contract.
Metro-North's
Coalition still refuses to accept ACRE's contract. ACRE
has again attempted to interfere with the Coalition's collective
bargaining process. The most recent attempt occurred on
March 23rd & 24 th in Baltimore. ACRE approached National
Mediation Board (NMB) representatives and attempted to convince
these representatives not to release the Metro-North Coalition
from mediation because they “expect” to have a contract
signed by the end of the year. Thankfully, ACRE has no influence
or creditability with the NMB.
ACRE's
goal remains the same as the current agreement. Their objective
is not to obtain a fair contract for their membership, but
determine how to sell whatever contract is negotiated to
the ACRE membership.
The
officers of Local 77
|