|
The
Month in Review for September 2006
Anthony
Bottalico was removed from the MTA Board. ACRE made several
last minute offers to the State Senate attempting to help
Bottalico stay on the MTA Board. The Senate rejected all
of ACRE's offers.
Bottalico's
replacement is Norman Brown from the International Association
of Machinist and Aerospace Workers. Congratulations to Norman.
It is refreshing to finally have a real union man in this
position.
Recently
ACRE was officially notified by the MTA that ACRE has the
55/20 benefit for health and welfare coverage in the MTA
Pension Plan. The notification came 2 ½ years after
ACRE ratified their “historic” contract. ACRE does not have
the 55/10 provision as previously claimed. The LIRR unions
have the 55/10 benefit. The 55/20 is a benefit for an employee
retiring at age 55 with 20 years of service to receive the
medical coverage until age 65.
ACRE
still insists after 3 months the M-N Coalition initialed
a contract. The Coalition signed a term sheet in late June.
A contract offer is a Memorandum of Understanding. If the
Coalition had signed a contract offer 3 months ago, it would
have been circulated for ratification or Metro-North would
have filed a complaint with the National Mediation Board.
(see Local 817 newsletter for verification,
appendix I) ACRE probably does not realize what a term
sheet is, ACRE signs whatever contract offer the MTA places
on the table.
The
2005 LM2 reports for ACRE Local Division 9 still have not
been received by the U.S. Department of Labor. These documents
were supposed to be filed by 3/31/06.
ACRE's
endorsement of Jeanine Pirro for N.Y. State Attorney General
was certainly ill advised. Review the article regarding
Jeanine Pirro's term of office as Westchester's County District
Attorney, which appeared in the Westchester Guardian (see
appendix II). The coverage of her troubles have been
well documented in the media these past several weeks.
ACRE
Local Division 1 announced that they advised ACRE members
participating in the Tims program to return the machines
because ACRE could not reach an agreement with Metro-North
for compensation for Train Service Members operating a Tims.
The program was a pilot program that expired on 8/31/06.
(see page 2 of the attached article from The Bulletin, NY
Division, Electric Railroaders' Association dated July 2006,
appendix
III). If ACRE attempted to secure an agreement for train
service members operation of the Tims machines, the agreement
should have been completed before ACRE members participated
in the program.
ACRE
is again informing members that ACRE will not accept a co-payment
of health and welfare benefits by members without obtaining
the lifetime medical coverage. ACRE has altered their position
several times this year concerning the co-payment issue.
Earlier this year, Mike Doyle informed some Division 9 members
that ACRE could not obtain the lifetime medical benefit
because the benefit was too expensive a cost item. ACRE's
reverting to its earlier position occurs after ACRE officers
spent most of the summer blaming the M-N Coalition for the
co-payment of health and welfare by insisting the Coalition
“signed” for the co-payment of health and welfare. ACRE
officers also contend that it would be useless for the organization
to fight the co-payment issue under this scenario. The M-N
Coalition did not sign a deal and ACRE forgets that during
promotion of the current contract, Doyle and Bottalico stated
they had “addressed” the issue by having the new hires co-pay
and that no current ACRE member would have to co-pay their
medical coverage. No conditions were included in ACRE's
assurances that no ACRE member would have to co-pay.
Have
an ACRE officer explain the escalator feature of the co-payment
for health and welfare. ACRE has avoided mentioning this
component of the co-payment.
The
officers of UTU Local 77
|