Dear Brothers and Sisters,

 

I hope this letter has information that you will fine helpful. Please read about the issues that face us and see where ACRE stops and common sense begins.

 

THE MERGER

ACRE has told the membership that there's no merger despite evidence to the contrary. A bill for the merger has been in the N.Y.Assembly since May 2006, Gary Delaverson who created ACRE and who has arranged the MTA payments to ACRE officers, is the MTAs Chief Financial officer in charge of the merger and CDOT is posturing as if they're going to take over operations on the shoreline and the New Haven Line if and when the merger happens.

Despite the Assembly Bill and ACREs' patriarch being the CFO for the merger, ACREs leaders say there's no merger. I believe they mean “at this moment”, and are hoping the membership translates that as “forever”. A little word game that cannot be called lying, is an ACRE hallmark.

ACRE states that the merger is UTU – BLET rhetoric. Did the UTU sponsor the bill before the NY Assembly? Did the BLET appoint Mr. Dellaverson to be the CFO in charge of the merger? ACRE apparently wants the merger to be a surprise for you.

If and when the merger happens – the Harlem and Hudson lines will be combined with the LIRR to form a new railroad – the MTA can start from scratch with our work rules and benefits. Mr. Delaverson, who just starved the Coalition without a contract for 4 and ½ years, will be in a position to “cherry pick” the cheapest benefits from the LIRR and Metro-North contracts. If we have Tier 5 on the property, we're in real danger of getting it forced on all of us.

OK, if that sounds extreme, then all members who have 10 or more years to have 55 years of age with 30 years service are virtually guaranteed to be in tier 5.

How? There are only two ways to change our pension, Legislatively or Collective Bargaining You figure “What's the chances?” well ACRE overpaid for tier 4 in the first place, then introduced tier 5 at the collective bargaining table THE VERY NEXT CONTRACT! ACRE is “batting 1,000” in this regard. If you have 10 years of people hiring out and working for a tier 5 pension, then how long will it be before they get to the bargaining table? They'll agree to EVERYONE going into tier 5 for an extra percentage point on a raise. If you vote yes for this contract, you'll be voting for yourself to go into tier 5, work till you're 62 and go into a needlessly inferior pension. When new hires get to the collective bargaining table, they will be glad to “repay” you for your consideration to them at this contract. You MUST keep tier 5 off the property!

ACRE says “There's no tier 5” Briefly; there's no tier 4 either! We are in a MTA pension that “mirrors” the NY State pension tier 4 benefit. We are not in a NY State pension. We have a “mirror Tier 4” MTA pension. The new pension is a “mirror Tier 5”. When ACRE says, “There is no Tier 5 in the contract” they are technically correct, but hoping that if you don't have a name for it – it doesn't exsist. Another one of those word games. The ACRE membership has yet to receive an informational meeting about their “mirror Tier 4” pension. Like your non-existent Agreement Books, ACRE is hoping you won't miss what you don't know or understand when it's GONE! That's why the membership is going to vote this contract down. Speaking of voting…

 

BALLOTS

All Ballots should have the ID numbers removed from your mailing envelopes and replaced with the members writing their own name and address with their verifiable signature on the mailing envelope. That's a legitimate VOTE!

 

ZERO's

Extending the contract 5 months is what the company wants so they won't have to contend with any future job action during the winter when everybody has to get to Wall Street. The extra 5 months gets them to the summer when most of our passengers take vacation. If we were offered an average 3% raise for those 5 months that would be giving it to the company at no cost. If ACRE (paid by company, hope for the best, expect the least) were negotiating in our best interest, they would be asking the company “How much over 3% are you willing to pay us for the extra 5 months? (Early buyout? – O.K.)” That's not what ACRE gets paid by the company to do. They are told by the company to sell our 5 months FOR A ZERO! ACRE states that the 5 months of ZERO pays for the early buyout. That adds up to an incredible amount of your money over your career. We just can't afford it.

 

PAYING FOR MEDICAL

ACRE says introducing Tier 5 on our membership will keep us from paying for our medical. In the same breath, ACRE says we should expect all of our members to pay for medical in the following contract. HUH? Why would we want to do that? ACRE says the new hires will have 30 years to sell out more future members to improve their pension (an ACRE tradition).

Why would we accept ANYTHING less than what the UTU negotiated for their members that work for SEPTA? How about we pay 1% of our first 40 hrs with a cap – right now - for everybody, without destroying the new hires (and our own) pensions? That would eliminate Tier 5 – everybody would have the same benefits – give no choice but tier 4 to the company if and when the merger happens, and put to rest this mindset of screwing the new hires for no reason at all.

 

COMMON SENSE

Does this make for a “common sense” argument?

The topper is we appear to be speeding towards a merger, and your representation is being paid BY THE COMPANY!

Common sense is what a UNION is founded on. The COMMON need of the membership to have solidarity with each other. The COMMON desires to have ALL members share in the benefits negotiated in our contracts EQUALLY. The COMMON goals that we should share, not split into different factions that turn us against ourselves to the delight of the company.

The Coalition was starved for 4&1/2 years into a desperate contract. We're without a contract for 5 months! Why is ACRE following suit? Why is ACRE pushing this contract on you?

Do you think that by having ACRE represent you that there is ANY chance of the members coming out ahead? The company pays ACRE for the concessions ACRE gives them at contract time.

No actuaries, No labor lawyers, No negotiations on your behalf, and with so many new members hired out - No agreement books. No security for the future of our membership. More ZERO's, and a blind alley for our pensions that we'll have to continue cannibalizing new members apparently forever. ACRE accomplishes a lot for the money they are paid by the company.

 

“A” SOLUTION

When you join a UNION you don't receive COMMON SENSE!

COMMON SENSE helps you receive a UNION!

 

¨ Get your verifiable signature onto your return ballot envelope.

¨ Vote “NO” for this contract; and make it count!

¨ Sign an “A” card.

¨ Bring the UTU back for legitimate representation at the collective bargaining table.

¨ Fight for your future and to preserve your past UTU agreements.

 

UTU Local 645 represents the Conductors on the LIRR. Their General Chairman, Anthony Simon, recognized immediately the major issue with the Coalitions' agreement. You cannot split the membership! Read his comments online at www.utulocal645.com/chairman.html

Read more information about your contract and working conditions online at

www.mtacre.com

 

 

 

          Respectfully Yours,

          Kevin A. O'Shea

          UTU Interim General Chairman

          Local 77